The Anabolic Again Muscle Building Prescription
December 26, 2011 by
Filed under Supplements
The Anabolic Again Muscle Building Prescription Oh Boy Here We Go Again! From The Creator Of Eat Stop Eat Comes The First Ever Muscle Building Program Designed To Combat Anabolic Slow Down…not Sure What Anabolic Slow Down Is? Your Customers Are Going To Love This! The Anabolic Again Muscle Building Prescription Overcoming Hypothyroidism – Hot [...]
Architects and engineers challenge official story of World Trade Center Building 7 collapse
August 20, 2011 by
Filed under Organic Foods
(NaturalNews) Most of us remember the horror of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, and the mental images of the collapse of the twin World Trade Center towers is forever etched into our minds. But while the reason for their demise is well-known, well documented and well accepted, there remain serious doubts about exactly why another WTC structure, Building 7, imploded in the afternoon on that fateful day. Scores of television and radio news outlets who had reporters on the scene, as well eyewitnesses and – perhaps most importantly – a number of architectural engineers all believe that WTC Building 7 buckled and fell not because of raging fires on the first floor that tore through office furniture and weakened the structure, as a government agency concluded , but because it had been rigged well in advance with explosives. As incredible as it sounds, the evidence – again, much of it from first-hand eyewitnesses and structural engineering experts – strongly supports that conclusion . According to a video report by AE911Truth, some 1,500 engineers and architects now say WTC 7 “could not have been brought down by office fires.” Watch the video at: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=100AB0D5050B41D63CBC2FC1451CEAED One of those expert critics is Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder of American Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth , who says fire has caused equal or worse damage to other, taller structures, without ever producing the same effect. “Fires have never before caused the collapse of any skyscraper, even though there are numerous examples of much hotter, larger and longer lasting fires in these buildings,” he said. “And in the case of Building 7, the fire that NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) said started the collapse had actually burned out over an hour before. “It could not have caused the collapse as [the government] said,” he added, noting that the very “modern” Building 7 was not struck by an aircraft and collapsed “mostly into its own footprint… in just under seven seconds.” Michael Donly, a structural engineer, says since the building “came down on its own footprint,” meaning that “all of the (support) columns needed to be severed at the same time in order for that structure to fall the way that we saw.” Adds Kathy McGrade, a metallurgical engineer, “The symmetry is the smoking gun.” Other experts interviewed for the video report said that when WTC 7 collapsed in the fluid manner in which it fell, it was obvious that it the top two-thirds of the building were not meeting any structural resistance from the ground level, meaning that all parts of the structure had to have collapsed in unison. Other experts said their visual analysis of the collapse was “a classic implosion,” as in, the building had been rigged to collapse in on itself. “In an office fire, you cannot generate enough heat to melt steel,” McGrade insisted. “And yet, we have evidence of molten iron” that was found in the debris of WTC 7. “R.J. Lee Company, USGS (United States Geological Survey) and [work from other experts] all three separately found these microspheres” of molten iron and steel – indicative of a thermitic reaction that likely destroyed the steel beams, she said. In addition to the physical evidence, NYC firefighters testified that they saw molten steel in the debris of WTC 7. The bottom line is this: If the building was destroyed purposely – and the evidence is very strong that it was – the question now is, why ? And if so, what was the point in covering it up? America lost nearly 3,000 sons, daughters, mothers and fathers on that fateful day. How does a cover-up do them justice? Watch the video at: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=100AB0D5050B41D63CBC2FC1451CEAED Sources: http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=909254 http://www.prisonplanet.com/architects-engineers-solving-the-mystery-of-wtc-7.html
Titanium Muscle Gain TM Muscle Gainer 3 Months Supply, Professional and Recreational Muscle Building, body building
July 25, 2011 by
Filed under Supplements
Titanium Muscle Gain TM Muscle Gainer 3 Months Supply, Professional and Recreational Muscle Building, body building Titanium Muscle Gain Muscle Gainer 30 capsules per bottle, 3 Bottles, 90 capsules, 3 Months supply, only 1 capsule needed per day Engineered for Muscle Building Manufactured in the USA Advanced Formula with No banned ingredients Titanium Muscle Gain [...]
NoXide – 90 Capsules 800mg Nitric Oxide Muscle Building And Muscle Enhancing Hemodilator sx
February 4, 2011 by
Filed under Supplements
NoXide – 90 Capsules 800mg Nitric Oxide Muscle Building And Muscle Enhancing Hemodilator sx Pack of 90 capules Used by body to transport oxygen and nutrients to muscle tissue Helps you experience intense pumps Not only each and every workout, but 24 hours a day as well NoXide contains nitric oxide which is a free-form [...]
Body Building & Muscle Gain.
December 10, 2010 by
Filed under Supplements
A few vitamins products I can recommend: Body Building & Muscle Gain. 6lbs Of Muscle In 15 Days. Totally Remarkable And Guaranteed!! Without The Use Of Drugs. Body Building & Muscle Gain. EZjuice Over 100 Delicious, Healthy, Juice Recipes just a button click away. Save time, look and feel great. One of a kind software [...]
Body Building Supplements – Are They Necessary?
September 4, 2010 by
Filed under Supplements
Anyone who has ever lifted weights knows it’s tough on the body, and your muscles become torn-down. Consistent weight training instigates a process of repeatedly breaking down the muscles; when they body repairs them, they come back even stronger. The really demanding part is when you do this everyday, or nearly every day of the [...]
Los Angeles may require new homes to capture rainwater
May 31, 2010 by Health Blogger
Filed under Organic Foods
(NaturalNews) The City of Los Angeles is considering a law that would require all new homes and large developments, along with some redevelopments, to harvest all rainwater that falls on site. The new law would require developers to capture 100 percent of the rainwater falling onto a site in a three-quarter-inch rain storm. Builders would have to use techniques such as permeable pavement, infiltration swales, curb bump-outs and storage cisterns to infiltrate water into the soil or store it for use. In addition to reducing demand on local aquifers and wastewater treatment plants, the measure would keep 104 million gallons of polluted runoff out of the ocean each year, according to its author Paula Daniels, commissioner of the Board of Public Works. Runoff from pavement and other hardscapes produced by urban sprawl is a major source of water pollution, washing contaminants from yards, buildings and roads into waterways and eventually into the ocean. Builders who fail to reduce their runoff to zero would be required to pay the city $13 per gallon. This money would be used to fund low-impact public developments such as the retrofitting of 24,000 linear feet of parkway in Mar Vista to infiltrate an additional two million gallons of storm water each year. The measure has come under strong opposition from the Building Industry Association, which already fought successfully to get the per-gallon fine lowered from $20 to $13. “We worked out something with the business community that they can release the runoff if they first run the water over a high-efficiency bio-filtration system,” Daniels said. “In other words, they have to clean it first.” The association remains fundamentally opposed to the law, however. The Department of Public Works approved the ordinance in January. To become law it must be adopted first by the City Council’s Energy and Environment committee and its Planning and Land Use Management committee. At that point, it would need to be approved by the city council and mayor. Sources for this story include: www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-rain-barrels1-2010feb01,0,1154413.story.